Jurors See Dramatic Reenactment of Defendant's Version of Bob Lee Stabbing

Witness Testifies That Defendant's Version of Events Is Accurate

In a dramatic turn of events, jurors in the Bob Lee stabbing trial witnessed a reenactment of the defendant's version of events. The reenactment, which was conducted by the defendant's attorney, showed the defendant acting in self-defense.

The reenactment was based on the testimony of the defendant, who claims that he stabbed Lee in self-defense after Lee attacked him with a knife. The reenactment showed the defendant backing away from Lee and attempting to de-escalate the situation before Lee lunged at him with a knife.

Witness Testimony Supports Defendant's Version of Events

The reenactment was supported by the testimony of a witness who said that he saw the defendant backing away from Lee before Lee lunged at him with a knife. The witness also testified that he heard Lee threaten to kill the defendant.

Prosecution Argues That Defendant's Version of Events Is Not True

The prosecution, however, argues that the defendant's version of events is not true. The prosecution claims that the defendant stabbed Lee in a fit of rage and that the defendant's actions were not justified.

Jury Will Decide Whether Defendant Acted in Self-Defense

The jury will now have to decide whether the defendant acted in self-defense. If the jury believes that the defendant acted in self-defense, the defendant will be acquitted of all charges. However, if the jury believes that the defendant did not act in self-defense, the defendant will be convicted of murder.

The trial is expected to continue for several more weeks.